CELLULITE NEWS FROM AROUND THE WORLD: “Thunder Thighs Might Actually Be Good for You,” A Dutch Study Reports

by Melissa, Lead Cellulite Investigator on September 14, 2009

in Fat,Media Chatter,Studies

Post image for CELLULITE NEWS FROM AROUND THE WORLD: “Thunder Thighs Might Actually Be Good for You,” A Dutch Study Reports

In recent cellulite-related news, a BBC headline caught ANALYST’s attention: “Larger Thighs ‘May Protect Heart.’

Based on a study published in the British Journal of Medicine, researchers found that people with small thighs (under 55cm in circumference) had twice the risk of early death or serious health problems.  The relationship remained consistent even when body fat, smoking, and blood cholesterol levels were all taken into account.  Experts hypothesized that narrow thighs could be associated with insufficient muscle mass and, therefore, increased susceptibility to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

The study followed 3,000 men and women in Copenhagen for over ten years.  For a more humerous take on the results, check out Kate Harding’s article on Salon.com, “Thunder Thighs May Be Good For You.”

Also, don’t forget to enter CI’s first prize giveaway to win a free dry brushing starter kitl! To be eligible, just comment on any post on the Cellulite Investigation website any time this week.  Good luck!

Share

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Anonymous September 15, 2009 at 10:43 pm

Sounds like a pretty weak study. Nonetheless, it does make me feel better about my thunder-thighs.

Reply

Melissa @ Cellulite Investigation September 16, 2009 at 9:07 am

Funny how the brain works that way, huh. I guess we'll take any validation we can get! I thought the study was interesting because it highlighted the problem of being underweight, which you don't hear a lot about these days. Tosca Reno mentioned it in The Butt Book, too. Just because you're thin, it doesn't mean you're at a good weight.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: